Careers Symposium 2021: The Private Sector

With early medical training occurring mostly in the public healthcare sector, it is not till years later where some amongst us may choose to transit into private healthcare. Careers Symposium has invited three doctors, Dr Noel Yeo, Dr Kenneth Tan and Dr Lim Hwee Yong, who have kindly shared with us their experiences and journey of venturing into the private sector of healthcare.

Dr Noel Yeo, Chief Operating Officer, IHH Healthcare Singapore

Dr Noel Yeo first shared with us a little on his transition into the private sector. After facing several barriers in applying for Ophthalmology and Orthopedics, Dr Yeo broke his bond prematurely by a year, and entered Healthway Medical Group as a private general practitioner (GP). He describes his switch of sectors as a lack of choice, rather than choosing to go into the private sector, due to his desire to leave the public healthcare system. However, upon discovering that he had gifts in managing businesses and people, Dr Yeo wished to learn more about hospital management and joined Mount Elisabeth Hospital in 2013. He eventually served as its CEO, and would go on to manage hospitals under Parkway Hospitals Singapore as well.

Dr Yeo’s sharing focuses on key considerations in the public versus private sectors.

Pay and Benefits

Where the pay is higher in private on a peer-to-peer comparison, Dr Yeo also feels that the higher workload in private healthcare may contribute to this difference. However, he emphasizes that one is able to decide their own workload in private healthcare. In terms of benefits, the healthcare benefits for both doctors and their dependents are less competitive in the private sector compared to the public sector.

Security and Progression

Where Dr Yeo states that whilst the public sector has a better perceived employability such as following the milestones in a structured residency programme, a key feature of working in private is the autonomy to carve out what one wants to achieve. In his words, “no one told that I could become a COO [Chief Operating Officer] after 10 years. {You have to] find your way and identify your own strengths, weaknesses, and top up skills by taking courses. Skills can be acquired on your own, but must be self-initiated”.

Competition and Workload

Competition may be higher in the private sector where many doctors are highly motivated and put in hard work. However, there is again the autonomy to decide one’s work-life balance and workload in the private sector.

Change and Innovation

Dr Yeo mentions that the private sector moves and evolves faster than the public sector due to the comparative absence of government-funded grants and subsidies.

Governance and Accountability

What comes with the autonomy in defining one’s goals and work-life balance, is also an increased individual ownership of governance and personal accountability. Dr Yeo emphasizes that being in the private sector comes with greater individual responsibility for one’s actions, without the support of an organisation.

Dr Yeo concludes his sharing with examples of crises he has faced in his job (a water hydrant bursting, a fire and COVID-19) and how he has managed these crises. To Dr Yeo, a job in the private sector is an exciting one, where self-ownership and self-development become key aspects of one’s career in order to progress.

Dr Kenneth Tan, Family Physician, Kenneth Tan Medical Clinic

Dr Kenneth Tan starts his talk with a reference to how Luffy, a character in known manga One Piece, enthusiastically states his dreams for the future. Similarly, Dr Tan encourages us to think about what kind of doctor we want to be. He shares that many people will advise to join a certain organisation or residency programme, but we can also have our own dreams and goals to start a solo practice--and realise years later that it was the right choice.

As a solo General Practitioner (GP), Dr Tan emphasizes that it is important to first know a few things: what doctor we want to be, what kind of patients we want to see, our scope of practice, business model and the benefits we hope to bring to society. Ultimately, we need to define our “treasure” and priorities, whether it be family, time, money or others.

Dr Tan shares about his own GP clinic practice. As a private GP, he not only sees “coughs and colds”, but also chronic diseases and even performs minor surgical procedures (toilet and suture, incision and drainage). He gives public talks to Family Service Centres to educate people in the heartlands on health issues. With COVID-19, his clinic has been able to take on a more active role in being a Public Health Preparedness Clinic and offering swabs to reduce the patient load at emergency departments. Dr Tan is also active in medical student education by taking and guiding medical students at his clinic.

Dr Tan then broadly covers the advantages and disadvantages of being a solo GP. A main advantage of being a solo GP would be the freedom and autonomy to determine multiple aspects: working hours, consequent pay, patient pool and profile, business model and most importantly, one’s priorities and goals in life. There is always something new to try, and the opportunity to proactively develop these skills. Being a solo GP also leaves time to pursue one’s passion, be it in clinical work, community work, research or education.

However, there are also disadvantages that come with being a solo GP. Where patient load is more within control in the public sector, private clinics often rely on word of mouth to reach out to patients. Effort must be made to reach out to both patients and colleagues that you lead as part of your team. A crucial aspect is the need to learn and manage the various aspects of a business model, including accounts, marketing, training, human resources and many more. Dr Tan acknowledges, though, that there are always blind spots when learning to run a business, and one must be prepared to fail as many things may not be within control.

Ultimately, Dr Tan hopes to “inspire people to go on their own journey”. Whether a GP practice succeeds depends on one’s management of both its clinical and business aspects as well as patients’ support for the practice. Yet, doctors in the private GP sector “do not go alone”—there will be other family physicians as well as your own staff team members who will support you in the journey.

Dr Lim Hwee Yong, Medical Oncologist, Novena Cancer Centre, Mount Elisabeth Novena Hospital

Dr Lim Hwee Yong begins with an overview of what he specializes in: cancer care. Recounting that cancer care has evolved a lot from when he was a medical student, he emphasizes how oncology involves a multi-disciplinary team and care encompassing not only multiple aspects of the individual patient (physical, mental, social, financial), but also considers the patient’s wider social circle. With today’s advances of oncology treatment, it is satisfying for Dr Lim to see how patients can continue going on with their lives after treatment. The holistic care of both a patient and the patient’s extended social circle, as well as the intellectual stimulation from oncological research, continues to motivate and inspire him till today.

Dr Lim then shares about the differences of various aspects between the private and public sectors.

Patient load

Where public organisations involve more bureaucracy, private healthcare offers the option to customize delivery of care based on individual preference. This means the ability to choose to see less patients in a day in order to spend more time per patient—which is especially important in oncology to address the patient’s and family’s concerns. Working hours and patient contact are also flexibly defined by the doctor in private healthcare. Thus, there is the option of building a closer doctor-patient relationship without the many time constraints of the public sector as well.

Working System

Without the need to work within a fixed pre-defined system, changes in the private sector can be effected much faster. For example, multidisciplinary tumour board discussions can take place faster, one can choose their own healthcare team members, and investigations for the patient can be run faster. This is also contributed by the abundancy of clinical resources in the private sector. In the public sector, Dr Lim notes that doctors would still be putting in a lot for patients, but this may not be conveyed as clearly to patients due to the system’s time limitations of a consult, and may lead to lower patient satisfaction.

Non-clinical Work

In the private sector, Dr Lim notes that there may be less opportunities for research participation and international engagements. However, this is not to say that there are none, and it is ultimately up to the individual doctor’s interests to pursue these opportunities. In terms of education, public doctors have sanctioned responsibilities for teaching the junior doctors and international exchanges, but private doctors may have more chances to educate the public and exchange information with colleagues of the same level.

Business Model

Dr Lim shares that managerial skills may be required when entering the private sector but are not mandatory if one chooses to join an established set-up. However, if one chooses to set up their own private practice, one must be prepared to settle many aspects of the business in the early phase. With time, these non-clinical duties can be delegated to staff members of the team.

Eventually, Dr Lim emphasizes that before transitioning to the private sector, it is crucial to hone one’s medical skills sufficiently first, which does take a long time and a lot of effort. One has to question if private sector care is what they really want by understanding the options and the challenges involved, speaking to friends or mentors, and asking themselves what truly makes them happy. Ultimately, the essential principle in Dr Lim’s words would to “always be the patient’s advocate, and do good for your patients”.

Careers Symposium 2021: Other Specialties

The Other Specialties talk involved a wide range of specialists.

Paediatrics: Dr Kristy Fu

The talk was kickstarted by Dr Kristy Fu, who is currently a Consultant in the Division of Paediatric Critical Care in the Department of Paediatrics under Khoo Teck Puat - National University Children's Medical Institute, National University Hospital. Dr Fu is also a passionate teacher and contributes to undergraduate and postgraduate education. She was awarded the Best Teacher Award and Best Young Clinician Mentor Award by the National University Hospital and Department of Paediatrics on many occasions.

She shared with us 4 guiding questions on how one should choose one’s residency. 1) What aspect of Medicine did I really enjoy in school and made me really excited to come to work daily? 2) What type of patient contact do I enjoy the most or can embrace the most? 3) What else apart from clinical medicine makes me happy? 4) Which residency programme would suit me? She then ended off by asking us to consider what kind of doctor we hope to become at the end of residency. These questions not only serve as wonderful core questions in the contemplation for the pursuit of residency, but also as essential questions one should ponder in the course of medicine, to determine one’s passions and interests.

Next, she shared a typical day in the life of a paediatric resident, which starts at 7am before formal ward rounds, is dotted with morning departmental teaching, and is followed by ward rounds at 9am. Around lunchtime, there is lunchtime teaching for residents, before clinics around 2pm. This is perhaps a format applicable to most other residency programmes too!

To find out more about the NUHS paediatric residency programme, she made a call for interested applicants to visit the NUHKids Open House which occurs in July annually, and also kindly opened up her mailbox for students to get in touch with her.

Anaesthesiology: Prof Tay Sook Muay

This was followed by a lively engagement by Prof. Tay Sook Muay, a familiar name to many who have walked through the doors of SGH. A Senior Consultant anaesthesiologist, she called on students to give oneself time to find out if one can truly cope with the various difficulties of the speciality. She shared, fittingly, that she had initially wanted to join Paediatrics, but realised that she could not cope with seeing children with cancer, especially back in the 1980s where cancer treatment wasn’t yet so developed.

She eventually decided on anaesthesiology after a posting opportunity opened her eyes to the field, and described anaesthesiology as having a good balance of physiology and pharmacology, alongside an understanding of anatomy.

Students who would enjoy constant contact with the patient and family after the patient moves to the ICU, who have both a steady heart and hand, and who have the ability to think on one’s feet to make quick decisions for therapy, this could be the place for you!

Emergency Medicine: Dr Peng Li Lee

Dr Peng Li Lee, Head and Senior Consultant of the Emergency Medicine Department at NUH, then commenced, with slides interspersed with warnings cautioning students with a faint heart to turn away. She described EMed as an Exciting field of clinical practice which allows integration of medical specialities in one, and described herself as a generalist with focus on acute care and resuscitation.

To her, EMed is a field that spans from cradle to grave, and where patients are more often than not seen once with no follow up. Being the first point of contact for most patients, she suggested the EMed doctors be able to triage, treat and street (discharge), advise or refer where needed. Even in EMed, she shared, there are many subspecialties to consider, including trauma, critical care, and toxicology.

For those interested in learning more about the schedules for a job entailing such high adrenaline, Dr Peng shared that doctors in the ED work in 3 shifts, which leaves some of them reeling from adrenaline late at night if they worked the afternoon shift, or gives them the opportunity to pursue their hobbies after work if they worked the morning shift.

Psychiatry: Dr Cyrus Ho

Next, we had a sharing from Dr Cyrus Ho, consultant psychiatrist at NUH. Speaking with a reassuring tone of voice and displaying a calm demeanour, he emphasised the importance of needing potential residents to be able to manage not only mental illnesses, but also to encourage wellness and resilience in patients.

He highlighted the importance for residents to able to handle ambiguity, to be emotionally stable and resilient, to be able to handle challenging events such as agitation, suicides and most importantly, to enjoy talking and be genuinely interested in lives of others.

He went a step further to share a list of pros and cons with those present at the talk, which has been reproduced here:

Pros

  1. Impact life of patient and families in the long term
  2. More time to know patients and their lives in depth
  3. Huge potential for exploration into neuroscience and neuropsychiatry
  4. Good work-life balance
  5. Can continue working for a long time

Cons

  1. No biomarkers or objective tools for diagnosis/ treatment, symptom-based, heterogenous presentation
  2. Can be emotionally draining
  3. Some disorders are untreatable
  4. Have to manage patient’s psychological issues
  5. Confusion with psychologists/ social worker/ counsellors

Our last two speakers, Dr Nga Min En and Dr Low Ying Liang, peppered their talks with jokes and called upon each other’s specialties as being greatly similar in nature.

Pathology: Dr Nga Min En

Dr Nga is an anatomical pathologist in NUH. Her areas of clinical and research interest include Cytopathology, particularly where it intersects with head and neck tumours. She has published in journals such as Cancer Cytopathology, Cell and Nature Communications.

She also has a keen interest in undergraduate, postgraduate and interprofessional teaching, and is the recipient of several NUS teaching awards. She has developed Pathweb, an online pathology resource that has users in over 70 countries. She has also written a Cytopathology textbook, which was published in 2021.

Dr Nga presented a set of slides with the famous dark blue colour as we have come to associate with M2 Pathology slides, and suggested using a set of screening questions to contemplate one’s pre-application suitability:

  1. Are your hobbies related to visuals e.g. photography, art
  2. Did you enjoy playing where’s wally?
  3. Do you enjoy jigsaw puzzles?
  4. Are you OK without too much human contact?
  5. Do you like working with your hands?
  6. Do you enjoy detective stories?
  7. Are you reasonably not allergic to studying?

She pointed out the differences between an anatomical pathologist/ histopathologist (who analyses tissue biopsies to provide a tissue diagnosis), a forensic pathologist (who performs forensic post-mortems to ascertain the cause of death) and a clinical/ chemical pathologist (who performs validation, analysis and interpretation of blood/ lab tests).

Radiology: Dr Low Ying Liang

Meanwhile, Dr Low Ying Liang is a Consultant Radiologist in National University Hospital, with subspecialty interests in Neuro, Head and Neck, and Body Imaging. He succinctly described radiologists as being the doctor’s doctor. He then shared a cheeky image published in the BMJ back in 2005, which brought grins to many present.

Picture1.png

We would like to thank all speakers who attended this year’s iteration of the Career Symposium for taking time off your busy schedules to share your experiences, and for leaving us with nuggets of wisdom and matters to ponder over. We look forward to the next!

Careers Symposium 2021: More than a Clinician

The second talk of Careers Symposium Day 1 focused on what it takes to become a clinician educator or a clinician scientist.

The first speaker was Assistant Professor Kenneth Ban, who is a medical educator and Assistant Professor at the Department of Biochemistry, and a senior lecturer and Phase 1 director at NUS Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine. Many of us fondly remember his lectures in our pre-clinical years! Assistant Professor Ban also leads the development of a longitudinal Health Informatics track, empowering this generation of medical students with data science competencies.

He started off by sharing his own experience with becoming a medical educator. For him, he was influenced from an early age by family, as his mother was a teacher. Often, he could see the joy she had in sharing her knowledge with students, and during Chinese New Year, students would come over to their house by their own volition. As a result, he started to appreciate the bond between student and teacher.

Also influenced by his own education, he shared that he had a mix of teachers who helped him understand that teaching is a calling. Many of us hold teachers in high regard, particularly those who broke down complex things into something that was understandable. Thus, he started to look into education more seriously as a career.

I’m sure many of us have also been curious why some doctors return to the preclinical sciences to teach us during our preclinical years. Prof. Ban shared that not many doctors do it and those that do have different reasons for doing it. For him, it was because someone had taken faith in him previously, so he was determined to pay it forward. He shared that when he was a medical student, the school offered an intercalated year for students to try out science. He completed the program, and ended up with a science degree. After doing his house officer rotation for a year, the then-head of the Department of Biochemistry called him and asked him if he was interested in pursuing academic medicine. And so, off to Stanford he went for his PhD in cell biology. After returning to Singapore, he was required to work in a research institute, and so he applied back to NUS, doing research and also teaching at the same time. In his early years, he was assigned to teach the Krebs cycle, which he acknowledged was difficult for students to take in. Thus, he strove to teach in the way he wants to be taught, and reviews what he teaches annually.

He ended off by saying that teachers have an enormous responsibility to make learning easier or more fun, and that all of us, as clinicians in the future, will also be educators to our own patients, hence educating is very relevant to us. Furthermore, in academic medical centres, it is also difficult to divorce clinical work from education and research.

The second sharing of the talk was by Dr Raghav Sundar, who is a Consultant in Oncology, specialising in gastrointestinal cancers and practices at the National Cancer Institute, Singapore. He is an alumnus of NUS Medicine. His research interests are developing novel genomic biomarkers and precision oncology, and he is also interested in Med Tech and AI. He shared his journey to becoming a clinician scientist as well as some hacks so that we can do the same!

After finishing med school, Dr Sundar went to do basic training in internal medicine, before subspecialising in medical oncology. In medical school he did UROPS, but he started doing more serious research once he entered medical oncology. As the practice of medical oncology is intertwined with research, there are many clinical trials to give patients new drugs.

He shared that it has taken him 18 years since 2003 to become a clinician scientist. It has involved a fellowship at the Royal Marsden in the United Kingdom, a Masters of Clinical Investigation, and embarking on a part-time PhD. In the process, he came to realise that if we do cutting edge research, we may be able to reach out to a wider range of people other than our own patients.

Why are people pursuing this path even though it is so hard? For him, what is essential is finding your niche, finding your space, and finding what you want to do.

He also shared a few tips to becoming a successful clinician scientist.

Hack 1: Find a good mentor and team, as it takes many people to raise a clinician scientist.

Hack 2: Find an understanding partner, otherwise it would be impossible to find the time to do the things that he needs to do. He also urges us to refrain from thinking that working more means that there will be less life, encouraging us to balance both at the same time.

Hack 3: Find meaning in what you do. If you find meaning in what you do, you won’t consider this as work. He also admitted that spent a lot of time soul searching and thinking about what he wanted to do before going down this path.

Hack 4: Don’t hesitate to grab an opportunity. He shared that in Singapore, we are very fortunate as opportunities are easily available with relatively less competition than in other parts of the world.

Next up, was Associate Professor Suresh Pillai, who is a Senior Consultant in the Emergency Medicine Department of National University Hospital. He is actively involved in the teaching of undergraduates, medical trainees, and nursing students, and has been a strong proponent of medical simulation training. His efforts have been recognised with numerous awards, including the NUS Faculty Teaching Excellence Award, Dean’s Award for Excellence in Undergraduate Teaching and Top Ten Tutors Award in Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine.

He started off by debunking the myth about clinician educators: “Those who can, do; those who can’t, teach”. This is untrue, as many clinician educators feel that there is no better reward than educating. Many clinician educators join due to intrinsic motivation and interest and enjoyment in the task. Not many, however, do it for pay raises or bonuses. For those who want to become clinician educators, it mostly consists of intrinsic rewards, so we need to come in with the right mindset.

Another reason that clinician educators do what they do, is because they want to demonstrate what it really means to be a physician, as what we read in the books do not show the full picture. By the bedside, they are models for students to become knowledgeable healers and do their best for patients with kindness, compassion and a constant search for new knowledge.

So what does a clinician educator actually do? Dr Pillai shared that firstly, they should have a clear set of values. Secondly, they have the ability to overcome obstacles and show to students that despite obstacles, patient care can still be achieved. Thirdly, they should be selfless and accepting of others. Fourthly, they have a commitment to the community. Last but not the least, they have the passion to inspire trainers. Thus, a clinician educator does many things, including lecture, teach and facilitate.

Dr Pillai also shared some tips about how we can prepare to be a clinician educator. We should educate ourselves about educational content and pedagogy by seeking out experts and keeping ourselves up-to-date. We should also keep in mind that practice makes perfect. Through deliberate practice, everyone can be achievers if taught at their own proficiency. Thus, we should challenge ourselves with learners of different levels and vary our teaching strategies. Additionally, we should aim to use multiple different formats in teaching, as well as participate in educational leadership and scholarship.

Why become a clinician educator? Dr Pillai ended the talk by sharing that the job has intangible rewards, and provides us with the ability to inspire students and educate the next generation. Such a job will also give us a valuable opportunity to pay it forward.